🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". A law could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to pass a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," stated one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some politicians to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more measured position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are no longer content to wait for platforms to self-regulate.